The Watching
I gave an instruction in a meeting. Not a request and not a suggestion. An instruction, in an ordinary voice, about something that had to be done by Thursday.
Two people looked at each other.
Fifteen years of running things, and the way I say something still gets more attention than the thing I say.
They hear a woman before they hear a decision
A man is allowed to be one thing. Women are expected to be about ten, and to move between them fast enough that nobody sees the effort.
Listen for that in the word “strong”. Somebody will call a woman strong in a tone that means “stronger than I am comfortable with”.
None of it is about the work. It is about what people expect a woman to sound like when she is the one deciding, and how far I sit from that.
The tiring part is not the leading. It is being read wrong before you have opened your mouth.
I was fluent in smaller
Softer opening, then a firmer close, then the other way round when that did not work either. I rewrote the same instruction three times looking for the version nobody could take badly.
I was good at it, in the way you get good at anything you do daily for a decade without noticing you are doing it.
Then I asked myself what exactly I was proving, and to whom, and I did not have an answer.
Nobody said a word when I stopped. That is the strange part. I had spent fifteen years of small effort on a room that was never going to comment either way, and I chose to spend them.
Nobody pays for what I see
Here is what the room never sees. The watching that makes people uneasy is the same watching that does the job.
That instruction came out of something I had been watching for about a month. Somebody was slipping. It had not reached their numbers yet, and it was going to.
I know when that is happening. I can walk into one of the stores and know the week has gone wrong before anybody has told me anything. It is in how somebody answers a simple question, and in who has stopped looking at me.
There is nothing mystical about that. It is attention, paid consistently over years, by somebody who has done the job long enough to recognise the early version of a problem.
When a man watches people that closely, it is called judgment. When I do it, it is called intuition.
Intuition is what you call competence when you would rather not pay for it.
I stopped submitting evidence
I explained myself for years. I built the case, showed the pattern, translated my own judgment into language for people who only trust a spreadsheet. Some of that was useful. Most of it was me asking permission to be right.
Now I say what I think is going to happen, and I let the next three months do the arguing.
It took me far too long to get there, and nobody made me spend those years explaining.
Their limit
Being a woman has never competed with this job. It competes with people who cannot take calm and decisiveness from the same person.
They lose things that way. They lose the month I could have given them.
I still notice the look. It stopped mattering a while ago.
If the way you said something has ever got more attention than the thing you said, tell me what that looked like in your room. An eyebrow, a glance across the table, whatever word they reached for.
Those replies become the next pieces.
This is UNTOLD. Where leadership sounds like a real voice.
Comments
Join the conversation, sign in with Google, email, or social.